Friday, May 1, 2009

A New Beginning for a Beloved Home...


...Ends with an Award-Winning Outcome

2009 TRIPLE AWARD WINNING PROJECT

NARI - Contractor of the Year Regional Winner - “Entire House Renovation”

HBA - Pinnacle Award Winner - “Best Residential Renovation”

Dream Home Award - “Best Whole House Remodel”

See our article in the May issue of the Montco/Main Line East House & Home Magazine.
Go to the online version now at www.housemagazine.com.
The article begins on page 34. Also, be sure to see page 53 as well.

To see more images of this project visit www.jfa-architecture.com

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Working with an Architect

Collaborating with an architect is often the name of the game for remodelers working on home improvement projects. Sometimes a client comes to a contractor with architectural plans already done, and in other instances, a designer is brought in to help with the layout of a specific area of a project. Navigating the relationship between contractor and architect can sometimes be a touchy situation, but it does not have to be. Like most relationships, success comes from good communication and teamwork.

Architects and remodelers come to the table with different skill sets. Architects have the reputation and schooling for creative design and often take the time to stay up on current product trends. Remodelers take stock in having the means and the methods needed to get a project done successfully. They rely on years of hands-on experience to troubleshoot projects and often take a practical approach to specifying materials and products used in a remodel. For these two professionals to work together, both parties need to set aside the ego and share control of the project.

The success of a project is contingent upon the tripartite relationship of owner, architect and builder. Each party has a unique role that they must contribute to the project. A remodeler is a skilled craftsman that excels in the art of construction. They are not trained designers or space planners. To expect a remodeler to design a building, places an unnecessary burden upon them that they are not educated to solve.

Conversely, while architects are trained in the design and constructability of a building, they cannot provide a definitive construction budget. At best, they can consult trade publications that may or may not accurately reflect the current costs based upon industry averages. Architects take a holistic view of the entire project. They realize that no part of the project exists in a vacuum and therefore, each and every component of a project affects the others. By the way, most townships and communities in Pennsylvania require construction documents to be prepared by a licensed architect.

In many cases, it makes sense for the architect to oversee the design decisions while the contractor takes charge of how to get the building done. Control should be shared, or passed back and forth, during different stages of a project. If there are differences in opinion, it is best for architects and designers to work out a solution that will best satisfy the client’s needs, not their own.

The essence of the relationship is collaboration. The collaboration of an architectural firm proficient in design excellence and a remodeler that excels in quality construction is the foundation for success. If this is true, then it only seems logical for remodelers and architects to align themselves in strategic partnerships from the beginning when marketing projects.

When remodeling projects are approached from a design-build basis, the architecture and budgeting are developed concurrently. As each phase of the design is completed by the architect, the remodeler is able to inform the owner of the probable cost of the project. This checks and balance keeps all of the team members enlighten without the fear of surprises.

A design-build approach avoids the pitfalls that some homeowners incur when presented with bids from multiple remodelers that are all beyond the anticipated project budget. This occurs when the construction documents are completed without the benefit of accurate cost estimating. After several months of the homeowner becoming intimately attached to the project of their dreams, they are confronted with the reality that it is beyond their budget. Even after the project is redesigned to conform to their budget, the homeowner is left with the regret of what the project could have been. This series of events is a detriment to the homeowner’s time, budget and patience.

Therefore, it appears to be most apparent, that the architect and remodeler need to rely upon the unique skills and expertise of one another to successfully design and construct an award-winning project. The design-build collaboration affords the homeowner several benefits; a project that is distinctively designed; a project cost that fits within their budget; and a project constructed in a beautiful manner.

Visit www.jfa-architecture.com to learn more.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

What is wrong with installing vinyl siding on older homes of character?

The use of vinyl siding on a historic building is inappropriate for three basic reasons:

1. It negatively alters the appearance. Attaching synthetic siding to an historic building will obscure the architectural elements that make it unique. Blatant removal of features is the most harmful aspect of a synthetic siding installation. Often times, decorative trim is completely stripped away from a home, leaving little more than a ghostly outline. Windowsills are usually the first to be cut back or taken away altogether in order to create an even surface. Another visual deterrent is vinyl siding’s narrower width and imitation raised grain, which are not exact replications of true wooden siding. The limited range of color that synthetic siding comes in is another downfall of its use, which cannot be changed without the removal and re-application of entirely new material.

2. It compromises architectural integrity. The vertically nailed furring strips that create a level surface on which the insulation and synthetic siding are directly attached to the wood siding can weaken the substrate it hangs from. Synthetic sidings is frequently applied to a building as a way to "quickly and inexpensively alleviate the burden of continual maintenance," and even to conceal problems that are in fact early warning signs of deterioration. The replacement of damaged wood siding is actually easier than either of the synthetics, as a single board of wood can be removed from almost anywhere on a house without disturbing those around it, unlike an interlocking system of vinyl. The ability to match paint exactly on a wooden surface is also far superior to that of pre-colored vinyl siding.

3. It has an adverse effect on the “health” of an historic building. The application of vinyl siding creates an environment for damage that the house would otherwise not face. The installation vinyl siding over wood inhibits the natural building material’s ability to expel moisture, or “breathe”, something it has to do in order to remain sound. When condensation from inside the house does not have the chance to escape, it can get trapped within the walls, causing moisture to either be absorbed by the wooden siding, framing, and sheathing, which results in rotten wood.

A word of caution: Vinyl siding leaks a lot. Water enters where vinyl panels overlap and at the end gaps inside the trim's receiving channels. Manufacturers even punch weep holes into the bottom edge of siding to let the water escape. Besides being careful to maintain the integrity of the tar paper or housewrap behind vinyl, quality builders recommend flashing windows and doors to direct water back out when it gets past the flanges or casing.

Vinyl-siding manufacturers try hard to make their panels look like real wood. Although the manufacturers are getting better, vinyl installs, behaves and performs much differently than the natural material it mimics. Whereas wood moves in response to moisture content, vinyl moves in response to temperature changes. And it can move a lot through expansion and contraction, especially along the length of the clapboard-style panels. To compensate for this movement, adjacent siding panels are overlapped so that they can slide sideways past each other without buckling or creating gaps. Nails are left proud of the surface to allow for this movement. Where panels meet windows, doors or corner boards, they are cut short, and receiving channels on the trim conceal the expansion gap.

Visit www.jfa-architecture.com to learn more.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

How the term “Design-Build” is often misused?

Often times, a general contracting company will inappropriately use the term “design-build” to describe their services when in fact a licensed architect is not being consulted. They may simply have a “creative” draftsman in their office that has basic drafting skills.

The fact is, general contractors are expected to be skilled craftsmen that excel in the art of construction. They are not trained architects or space planners. Expecting a contractor to design a building, places an unnecessary burden upon him that he is not trained to solve. One just needs to look at the many mediocre homes that populate our communities!

Conversely, while architects are trained in the design and constructability of a building, they cannot provide a definitive construction budget. At best, they can consult trade publications that may or may not accurately reflect the current costs based upon industry averages.

Architects take a holistic view of the entire project. They realize that no part of the project exists in a vacuum and therefore, each and every component of a project affects the others.

By the way, most townships and communities in Pennsylvania require construction documents to be prepared by a licensed architect.

Visit www.jfa-architecture.com to learn more.